If the Commonwealth of Massachusetts considered Ted property rather than a person, then his arrest record and any convictions would actually be invalidated and couldn't be used against him - "property" can't be convicted of a crime.Similarly, they wouldn't have any jurisdiction over his employment status at the grocery store and would have no say over whether he could maintain employment there or anywhere else. The grocery store wouldn't be bound by any employment laws which apply to people. They could enter into any agreement with Ted (or his owner) under any terms they wanted because the employment laws wouldn't apply.
Scritto da il
05/03/2025 alle ore 09:06
Consiglia
Voto
Nessun dato in archivio
Commenti
Nessun dato in archivio
